Monday, August 22, 2016

I hypothesize no less than six sources of human advancement

history channel documentary I hypothesize no less than six sources of human advancement. This will contradict Darwinists and Religionists who support the Adam and Eve hypothesis. My reason originates from the confirmation exhibited by hair shading and cross segment, and all the more critically, blood classifications. I imagine the accompanying gatherings. Chilean man, in all likelihood from what we now call Easter Island, Peruvian man or Mayan who turned into our American Indian tribes and crossed the Bering Straits to settle in Asia, Scandinavian man who is the first of the Caucasians, Central European man who inclined toward India, Egyptian man who exceeded expectations set up and moved everywhere throughout the world, and African man who stayed in Africa until the slave exchanges constrained him out and into the Americas. Timing is the most hard to set up, and I will rehash dates that have been set up by others, however with no confirmation on my part. They are said just as a benchmark and can't be confirmed nor disproved viably.

Generous and solid, he made a tough swashbuckler. His deficiency is because of a prevalence of Rh-negative blood classification. His hair is oval fit as a fiddle and fine, wavy to wavy. Red, fair and cocoa hues are unmistakable and he regularly has blue eyes. His light skin ensures against frostbite, furthermore to metabolize vitamin D. This man initially showed up in Norway and moved both toward the south and west. His development toward the east is restricted, yet not unfound. He was a strong soul and restrained the north oceans by creating cruising ships. He settled what we now call Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the British Isles, and Northern America. He tamed the abundant reindeer or elk and settled in little gatherings, remaining a seeker/gatherer and angler. The climate was not condusive to a mass progress.

No comments:

Post a Comment