One feedback of von Daniken's (and others) 'old space explorers' was the "proof"

history channel documentary They, the extraterrestrials, made their nearness felt at the beginning of humankind's development; however subsequently, in light of the fact that there were so large portions of them, polytheism turned into the religious request of the day to the extent the different human societies were concerned. The people clearly confused the propelled extraterrestrials for powerful gods, worshiping what they believed were the 'divine beings', yet who as a general rule were, best case scenario pseudo-divine beings.

Discourse: One feedback of von Daniken's (and others) 'old space explorers' was the "proof" in their utilization of their propelled advancements in building, or helping with the working of the old Egyptian or Mesoamerican pyramid and other stupendous developments or well, landmarks. Commentators recommend that it affronts the thinking, cleverness, inventiveness, unyielding quality, creative ability, knowledge and different capacities of our remote precursors. In the event that that is the situation, and I concur it is, then it's similarly offending to recommend that they couldn't recognize truth from fiction and designed nonexistent creatures (their 'divine beings') out of entire anecdotal material rather than displaying their "divine beings" as genuine elements. They unquestionably trusted their "divine beings" were truly genuine, so how about we assume the best about them and say that they were to be sure truly genuine.